and negative comments about increased promotional activity at old navy, and these two things got the sell-off ball rolling. to me, the idea of dumping gap because november was a bit worse than expected is insane. first of all, this november was a real a abhor ant month. you had unseasonably warm weather on the west coast, sandy on the east coast, and these numbers are notoriously choppy. don't give you a good reed and so many have stopped leasing monthly figures and also there was just an annoyity for hedge funds, and historically, november same store sales numbers, not a good predictor of what happens in december. what we care about now. as for the worries about promotional activity, goldman sachs did channel checks, found no unusual promotional activity. the company still looks spot on, ta-dah, so if the reasons for the sell-off are overblown, what should we care about when it comes to gap? i have to come back to the strength of the turn around and how this is still in its early stages, gap spent a decade in the wilderness, but last year under leadership of glen murphy, manna from